NAAC Criterion 2 – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation 

Metric No. Key Indicator Supportive Documents
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1

Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness  by providing reservation of seats  to all categories during the admission process

2.1.1.1 Average percentage of seats filled  against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable  reservation policy as per GoI or State Govt. norms during the last five years

View Document
2.1.2

Student Demand Ratio, applicable to programmes where State / Central Common Entrance Tests are not conducted

2.1.2.1 Number of seats available year-wise/eligible applications received during the last five years where State / Central Common Entrance Tests are not conducted

View Document
2.1.3

Student enrolment pattern and student profile to demonstrate   national/international  spread of enrolled students from other states and countries

2.1.3.1Average percentage of students from other states and countries (year-wise) during the last five years

2.1.3.2 Total number of students enrolled in that year

View Document
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 The Institution assesses the learning levels of the students after admission and organises  special programmes for advanced learners and slow performers  View Document
2.2.2 Student – Fulltime teacher ratio  View Document
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
2.3.1 Student-centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences View Document
2.3.2 Has provision for the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory and Simulation Based Learning View Document
2.3.3 Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process, including online e-resources View Document
2.3.4 Student :Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year) View Document
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1 Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years View Document
2.4.2

Average percentage of fulltime teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./ DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities /other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils / Universities during the last five years

2.3.2.1 Number of fulltime teachers with Ph.D/D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities / other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils. Last five years data to be entered.

View Document
2.4.3

Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (preceding academic year)

2.4.3.1 Total teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (cumulative experience)

View Document
2.4.4 Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-contents / e-courses / video lectures / demonstrations  during the last 5 years View Document
2.4.5 Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five years View Document
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1

Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination to  the date of declaration of  results during the last  five years

2.5.1.1.  Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination to the date of declaration of results year-wise in that year and during the last  five years

2.5.1.2. Total number of semester / annual exams in that year

View Document
2.5.2

Average percentage of student complaints / grievances about evaluation, against the total number of students appeared in the examinations during the last five years

2.5.2.1 Number of student complaints/grievances about evaluation year-wise during the last five years (Year wise details of number of complaints/grievances received from students regarding evaluation)

View Document
2.5.3 Evaluation-related Grievance Redressal mechanism followed by the Institution View Document
2.5.4 Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including Continuous Internal Assessment to improve the examination system. View Document
2.5.5 Status of automation of the Examination division, using Examination Management System (EMS) along with an approved online Examination Manual View Document
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 The Institution has stated learning outcomes /graduate attributes as per the provisions of Regulatory bodies which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents View Document
2.6.2 Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years View Document
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding teaching learning process View Document